![]() ![]() The sRGB color space was established back in the late 1980s or early 1980s for the monitor technology that was available then. The other problem is that before too long, displays and monitors (printers are already there) will have gamuts larer than the oldeRGB standard. On the printer, the media being used to print on, and the quality oif the profile. On the subject -does it contain even mildly saturated colors that are clipped by the small sRGB gamut but not by the larger Adobe RGB(1998) gamut? "Would you be able to look at them and in 1 second say, "that one is obviously the sRGB file?" Do you think the average digicam user could see it right away?" The soft proofing tool is also handy to compare the printer gamut capability from different companies, for example, you can compare mpix's printer profile and West Coast Imaging's profile and see which one can handle your file the best. The mpix profile using Kodak Endura paper is quite good, I seldom see out of gamut problems. When your file is in its default color space, you can use the soft proofing feature to simulate what the print will look like on your monitor, you can also look for areas that are out of gamut so you can fix it ahead of time. One helpful tool to use is the Photoshop Soft Proofing feature. Then you send them the file and tell the company not to color manage the files. After you prepare your file image, you have to CONVERT the file from its native color space (Adobe RGB or sRGB or whatever) to the printer color profile. The important thing is you have to know their printer profile (their printer ICC profile is available online). If you are very sure about your color management skill, you can choose an online service that does not do any color conversion for you and print your file as is. Sometimes the companies may choose to do some color tweaking for you as part of their service. sRGB for mpix, sRGB/AdobeRGB or whatever for WC Imaging)to the printer color profile before printing the image. In the above two cases, the online companies carry out a color conversion for you as part of their workflow, from native color space embedded in the image (e.g. ![]() Other companies like does not care what kind of color space you send them, they will do the conversion for you, no different from you printing your file on your printer. If you don't want to have any data loss due to conversion, you can play with the level adjustment tool before the conversion to "tighten up" the histogram (make it narrower). The conversion is usually unperceptable, but if you look at the histogram, you will see changes in the histogram shape, and you'll often find clipping on one or both ends of the histogram, showing you've lost data due to the smaller sRGB gamut. You'll notice when you do the Adobe RGB to sRGB conversion, you will find very little color change on the monitor. You keep your original master file in the default Adobe RGB space with no changes. That means you CONVERT your AdobeRGB file to a sRGB space and send them the new print file. When you print your file through an online service, you have to ask them how they would like the file to be color managed. Once you have picked a default color space to work with, you should use it across the board on all your master image files. There are other color space with wider gamut, but Adobe RGB is probably the most popular one. Most people prefer to use Adobe RGB because it has a wider gamut space, it contains more color. Please allow me to sort this out for you.įirst, sRGB and Adobe RGB are the native color space you work under. There are quite a number of erroneous posts here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |